The petitioner, appearing through counsel, stated that he did not wish to press the writ petition. The State respondents had no objection. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:110111
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5277 of 2024
Petitioner :- Ram Ashish Yadav (Ram Ashish) Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sarvanand Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Sri Sarvanand Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner after making submissions to some extent states that he does not wish to press the petition.
Sri Anand Bhaskar Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents, has no objection.
The petition stands dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 8.7.2024 Arun K. Singh
[Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.]
Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Ashish Yadav
State Of U.P.
Others
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
