The High Court held that the petition is admitable in its criminal jurisdiction. The respondent authorities failed to initiate action under Sections 238, 234, and 239, while an inquiry is ongoing under Section 233, which does not bar this writ jurisdiction.
Petition admitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:34823
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4030 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ugrasen Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Civil Secrt. Lko. And 6 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ambuj Kumar,Raj Priya Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Order Date :- 6.5.2024 Sumit Kapoor
Digitally signed by :- SUMIT KAPOOR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition is maintainable in this writ jurisdiction for the orders impugned.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ugrasen Singh
State Of U.P
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
