Single Judge allowed bail to the applicant in a cheating case involving land purchase fraud, noting the applicant was falsely implicated, has no criminal history, co-accused were on bail, and charges were not framed.
Release of the applicant on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties on specified conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:34650
Court No. - 19
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9590 of 2023
Applicant :- Chhotelal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Krishna Ram Yadav,Arshad Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
have already been granted bail means of the orders dated 07.11.2023 and 09.11.2023 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.13215 of 2023 and 13536 of 2023 respectively.
(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;
(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;
(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court.
Order Date :- 3.5.2024 akhilesh/-
(Subhash Vidyarthi, J.)
Digitally signed by :- AKHILESHWAR KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant, who was falsely implicated and has no criminal history, is eligible for bail in a cheating case.
Whether the fact that co-accused have already been granted bail affects the bail prospects of the applicant.
Chhotelal
State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
