Pankaj Sharma v. State of Up and 5 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Interlocutory order listing the matter for filing of a reply to an instruction document placed on record by the counsel for the respondent Gaon Sabha.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29553 of 2024
Petitioner :- Pankaj Sharma Respondent :- State Of Up And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nishi Sengar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Krishna Kant Singh
Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
- Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, learned counsel for respondentGaon Sabha placed the instruction dated 3.9.2024 before the Court which is taken on record.
- Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, learned counsel for respondentGaon Sabha submitted that complaint made by the petitioner has already been considered and the same has been found misconceived by the authorities, as such, the prayer made in the writ petition cannot be entertained.
- Learned counsel for the petitioner is disputing the facts mentioned in the instruction.
- Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, learned counsel for respondentGaon Sabha shall serve the copy of the instruction upon learned counsel for the petitioner.
- Learned counsel for the petitioner shall file reply to the facts mentioned in the instruction.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pankaj Sharma
- respondent
State Of Up
- respondent
Gaon Sabha
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/29553/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court