Non-appearance. The court notes the applicant's lack of interest due to non-appearance on multiple previous dates and the present listing. The anticipatory bail application is consigned to the record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:144803
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5739 of 2024
Applicant :- Susheel Kumar And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Aakash Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
List has been revised. No one has appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this application.
Previously, on 5.6.2024 and 8.8.2024 also no one has appeared on behalf of the applicant.
It seems that the applicant has lost interest in the present anticipatory bail application.
Accordingly, consigned to the record.
Order Date :- 5.9.2024 Bhaskar
Digitally signed by :- BHASKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Susheel Kumar And Another
State of U.P. and Another
Vikram D. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
