Mamata and Another v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Listing order for Writ Petition. Petitioners were absent despite revised call notice. Standing counsel for the State was present. The matter was adjourned for fresh hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26265 of 2024
Petitioner :- Mamata And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Maurya,Shweta Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
- None appeared on behalf of petitioners, even in revised call, whereas, learned standing counsel for the State-respondent is present.
- Put up as fresh on 07.03.2025.
Order Date :- 4.12.2024 KK Patel
Justice Vinod Diwakar
Digitally signed by :- KRISHN KANT PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mamata And Another
- respondent
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Coram
Vinod Diwakar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/26265/2024
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court