Writ petition seeking protection for a couple who married without parents' consent. Verification found the petitioner's age documents and marriage certificate to be false. The court ordered the S.H.O. to inquire into procurement of the fake certificate and register FIR if offence is revealed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23160 of 2024
Petitioner :- Smt. Sukhjeet Kaur Sandhu And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aman Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
where the petitioners have procured the alleged marriage certificate annexed with the petition, and role of individuals like President/Secretary of the society, the purohit or any other those who have helped in providing the fake document shall be inquired and if offence revealed, a FIR be registered accordingly.
Order Date :- 21.11.2024 Kumar Manish
Justice Vinod Diwakar
Digitally signed by :- MANISH TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Should protection be given to petitioners who married without parental consent, given doubts about their age proof and marriage certificate?
Smt. Sukhjeet Kaur Sandhu
petitioner no. 2
State of U.P.
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
