A writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of the petitioners' counsel and lack of any request for adjournment, while the State's counsel was present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 80
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23124 of 2024
Petitioner :- Smt Khyati Dixit And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Atul Pandey,Dewarshi Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
Order Date :- 1.10.2024
Ujjawal
Justice Vinod Diwakar
Digitally signed by :- UJJAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition should proceed given the petitioner's absence and failure to seek adjournment?
Smt Khyati Dixit
Another
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
