Petitioners sought to carry out contracted work said to be affected by a stay order in an earlier writ. Instructions indicated their work was outside that stay's coverage; authorities were directed to execute the work agreement and permit the work per law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:149049-DB
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14687 of 2024
Petitioner :- M/S Dwivedi Constructions And Another Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.
Order Date :- 11.9.2024 Dev/-
( Manjive Shukla,J. ) ( Shekhar B. Saraf,J. )
Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners' work falls within the scope of the stay order dated September 8, 2022 in Writ-C No. 24247 of 2022.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
M/s. Rani Awasthi, Through its Proprietor Rani Awasthi and Another Vs. State of U.P. and OthersReferred¶3
Writ - C No.24247 of 2022 (M/s. Rani Awasthi, Through its Proprietor Rani Awasthi and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Others)
M/S Dwivedi Constructions
Another
State of U.P.
Another
Shekhar B. Saraf
Manjive Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
