Petitioner challenged freezing of its bank accounts by the respondent Bank of Baroda. Court found lack of specific instruction from State/Police. Ordered bank to de-freeze accounts immediately.
Respondent Bank directed to immediately de-freeze petitioner's accounts and allow day to day activities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:110910-DB
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7047 of 2024
Petitioner :- Dawate-E Islami Hind Trust Masjid Bibi Ulfat Respondent :- State Of Up And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Piyush Sinha Counsel for Respondent :- Anadi Krishna Narayana,C.S.C.,Sandeep Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.
day to day activities on the same.
Order Date :- 9.7.2024 Kuldeep
(Manjive Shukla, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner bank accounts were legitimately frozen based on state/police instructions.
What direction should be issued to the bank regarding the frozen accounts.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dawate-E Islami Hind Trust Masjid Bibi Ulfat
State Of Up And 4 Others
Shekhar B. Saraf
Manjive Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
