Revisional exercise reveals that the petitioner's counsel had no instruction to file the writ petition. Upon disclosure of this defect, the petition was dismissed for want of instruction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 4515 of 1981
Petitioner :- Ram Bahal And Others
Respondent :- Asstt. Director Of Consolidation Sultanpur And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K.Mehrotra Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.Chaudhary,Prabhakar Vardhan Chaudhary
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners says that he has no instruction in the matter and prays that the present petition may be dismissed accordingly.
No objection has been made by Mr. Prabhakar Vardhan Chaudhary, learned counsel for the private respondents.
Accordingly, the matter is dismissed for want of instruction.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 13.3.2024 (Manoj K.)
Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ram Bahal And Others
Asstt. Director Of Consolidation Sultanpur And Others
Saurabh Lavania
Manoj Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
