Amar Nath and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Revenue Deptt., Lucknow and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition adjourned as counsel for petitioners was reported ill; case listed for a later date.
What the court decided
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 309 of 2024
Petitioner :- Amar Nath And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Revenue Deptt., Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Asthana Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is reported to be ill.
List this case again.
Order Date :- 15.4.2024 S. Kumar
Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Amar Nath
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Revenue Deptt., Lucknow
Coram
Manish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIB/309/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Saksham Lamba vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief/Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Lko. and 2 Others
Mohini Awasthi and Another vs Umesh Kumar and 2 Others
M/S Spring Garden Thru. Partner, Smt. Neelam Yadav vs Board of Revenue, U.P. Thru. Chairman Lucknow and Others
K.R.S. Infra Developers Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Its Managing Director Narendra Kumar Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Lko. and 3 Others