Writ petition dismissed in default as neither counsel for the petitioners appeared nor sought adjournment despite prior notice that no further adjournment would be granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:39160
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 259 of 1982
Petitioner :- Ram Samujh And Others. Respondent :- Smt.Chandra Pali And Others. Counsel for Petitioner :- N.K. Pandey,D.C. Mukergee,Indrajeet Shukla,J.P. Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- P.L. Misra,C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
On the last occasion i.e. 2.5.2024 the following order had been passed:
"1. Shri J.P. Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner is reported to be ill.
2. Earlier also, when the matter was listed on 18.06.2023 the illness slip was sent by learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. List this case in the next cause list.
4. On the next date of listing, the matter will not be adjourned and appropriate order will be passed."
Today the case has been called in the revised list.
Neither the learned counsel for the petitioners is present nor any request has been made on their behalf for adjournment of the case.
Writ petition is dismissed in default.
Order Date :- 23.5.2024 S. Kumar
Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ram Samujh And Others
Smt.Chandra Pali And Others
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
