In this writ petition challenging an order for non-appearance, the High Court held that the impugned order issued in contempt proceedings was passed during hearing. The court found the petitioner could raise the issue during the next tribunal hearing rather than seeking immediate interference with the tribunal order.
Writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:114114-DB
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9573 of 2024
Petitioner :- Dr. Triveni Dutt Respondent :- Dhirendra Kumar Counsel for Petitioner :- Narendra Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
of the said fact, the impugned order should not have been passed.
"Shri K. P. Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri N. P. Singh, learned counsel for the respondents are present.
Dr. Triveni Dutt, Director IVRI appeared through video conferencing.
Counter reply filed on 01.07.2024 is not on record. Registry is directed to trace the same and place it on record.
List on 25.07.2024.
Dr. Triveni Dutt, who appeared today, will also join the proceedings through video conferencing on the date fixed in the matter to explain the facts."
Order Date :- 18.7.2024 Ved Prakash
(Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether pending restoration application filed in higher court can be a ground to set aside tribunal order for non-compliance in contempt proceedings.
Whether petitioner can raise new fact regarding pending appeal for first time before tribunal after order was passed.
Dr. Triveni Dutt
Dhirendra Kumar
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Manish Kumar Nigam
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
