Counsel for the petitioner stated a lack of instructions. The writ petition was dismissed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Allahabad High Court Rules without adjudication on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:74948
Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9240 of 2024 Petitioner :- Akshay Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P Thru. Addil. Chief Secy. Deptt. Basic Education Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Naveen Shukla,Jayshanker Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shailendra Singh Rajawat
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not have any instructions in the matter, consequently he is unable to take steps.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Allahabad High Court Rules.
Order Date :- 13.11.2024 J. K. Dinkar
Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Akshay Kumar Singh
State Of U.P Thru. Addil. Chief Secy. Deptt. Basic Education Lko. And 4 Others
Abdul Moin
J. K. Dinkar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
