Chandrika Prasad and Others v. Union of India Thru. Secy. Ministry of Civil Aviation New Delhi and 5 Others
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9287 of 2024
Petitioner :- Chandrika Prasad And Others Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Civil Aviation New Delhi And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Dubey,Suresh Chandra Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Akhilesh Pratap Singh,Birendra Prasad Singh
Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
Heard learned counsel for petitioners, Mr. Raj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for opposite parties no.1 & 2, Mr. B.P. Singh, learned counsel for opposite parties no.3 & 4 and Mr. Birendra Prasad Singh, learned counsel for opposite parties no.5 & 6.
Opposite parties are granted four weeks' time to file counter affidavit.
Connect and list alongwith Writ-A No. 8350 of 2024. Pleadings shall be exchanged in the meantime.
Order Date :- 4.10.2024 Satish
Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Chandrika Prasad
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
Manish Mathur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIA/9287/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Sarika Devi vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Edu. Deptt. Lko and 2 Others
Dayaram vs Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Region, Ayodhya and Others
Deepak Mishra vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Akshay Kumar Singh vs State of U.P Thru. Addil. Chief Secy. Deptt. Basic Education Lko. and 4 Others