The petitioner sought quashing of a suspension order and expedition of disciplinary proceedings. The respondent counsel undertook to conclude proceedings within two months. The petition was disposed of based on this undertaking.
The petition was disposed of based on the respondent's undertaking to conclude disciplinary proceedings within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:115815
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8818 of 2024
Petitioner :- Ashok Priya Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Farhin Sahiba,Ghanshyam Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Udit Chandra
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Order Date :- 22.7.2024/saqlain
Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition to quash the suspension order and expedite disciplinary proceedings should be disposed of pending the authority's undertaking.
Whether the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner require quashing due to delay.
Ashok Priya
State Of Up
District Basic Education Officer, Mathura
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
