Disposed

Punit Kumar Mishra v. Chairman Aryavart Bank Head Office Lko and 5 Others

Allahabad HC13 Sept 2024WRIA/7892/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging rejection of compassionate appointment application. Court granted liberty to file fresh representation for absorption/accommodation in regular capacity, not compassionate basis, with a deadline for the bank authority to decide.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to make fresh representation for absorption/accommodation in regular capacity within eight weeks; petition disposed of.

Punit Kumar Mishra vs Chairman Aryavart Bank Head… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:63558

¶2

Court No. - 18

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7892 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Punit Kumar Mishra Respondent :- Chairman Aryavart Bank Head Office Lko And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hari Narayan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Pravin Kumar Singh

¶5

Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel petitioner and Mr. Pravin Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for opposite parties whose power filed today is taken on record.

¶7

Petition has been filed challenging order dated 04.05.2024 rejecting petitioner's application for compassionate appointment on the ground that at the time of demise of petitioner's father while in service of the Bank, there was no provision for compassionate appointment which has thereafter been introduced subsequently and applies on dependents of only those persons who have passed away while in service of Bank after 08.02.2014 and since petitioner's father had passed on 18.10.2010, he is not covered by the aforesaid scheme.

¶8

Learned counsel for petitioner on the basis of instructions, however, submits that petitioner is in actually in service of the Bank concerned but only on temporary basis and he is not pressing the prayer no. 1 and is placing reliance only on prayer no. 2 for a direction to opposite parties to consider petitioner's accommodation/absorption in the appeal concerned in any regular capacity.

¶9

In view of such submission, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation with regard to absorption/accommodation on any post in the bank concerned but not on compassionate basis. Such a representation shall be made to the concerned authority which shall be considered and decided in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.

¶10

With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of.

¶11

Order Date :- 13.9.2024 Satish

¶12

Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Punit Kumar Mishra v. Chairman Aryavart Bank Head Office Lko and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Punit Kumar Mishra v. Chairman Aryavart Bank Head Office Lko and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Arun Kumar Awasthi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Education (Secondary) and 4 Others

Ganga Sagar Vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Deptt. Telecommunication Ministry Communication, New Delhi and 2 Others

Rajendra Kumar Srivastava Vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Deptt. Tele Communications Ministry New Delhi and 2 Others

C/M , Kanya Junior High School Thru. Manager Sri Jiya Lal Vishwakrma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education and 2 Others

Punit Kumar Mishra Vs Chairman Aryavart Bank Head Office Lko and 5 Others

Lalji Kewat Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Higher Education Lko. and Another