This judgment disposed of a writ petition by directing the District Basic Education Officer to decide a fresh representation on delayed gratuity payment within six weeks, reserving adjudication of merits.
Direction to respondent no.3 to decide petitioner's representation within six weeks via reasoned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:33039
Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3274 of 2024 Petitioner :- Salil Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education Lko. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Durga Prasad Shukla,Garima Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shailendra Singh Rajawat
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 & 2 and Shri Shailendra Singh Rajawat, learned counsel for the respondents no. 3 & 4.
With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally decided.
The instant writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay the interest on the delayed payment of gratuity of petitioners mother.
After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the reliefs sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no.3 i.e. District Basic Education Officer, Amethi which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Counsel for the respondents has no objection.
In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.3 then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and the relevant rules within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order.
With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of .
It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner.
Order Date :- 27.4.2024 J. K. Dinkar
Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant time-bound direction to authorities for deciding a representation regarding delayed gratuity payment without adjudicating merits.
Salil Mishra
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education Lko.
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
