Widow sought interest on gratuity paid thirteen years after her husband's death. Court directed a fresh representation to the District Basic Education Officer to decide entitlement within six weeks in light of Janki Devi, with payment thereafter if entitled; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:6547
Court No. - 17
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 189 of 2024 Petitioner :- Vineeta Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Education Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Keshari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
Order Date :- 23.1.2024 Subodh/-
Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to interest on delayed payment of gratuity under Section 7(3A) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Janki Devi versus State of U.P. and othersRelied on¶5
Writ-A No. 7932 of 2023
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vineeta Gupta
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Education Lko.
District Basic Education Officer, District Ambedkar Nagar
Manish Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
