Disposed

Neelam Kumari v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Basic Education Lko. and 5 Others

Allahabad HC23 Feb 2024WRIA/1405/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought posting near her residence citing her son's medical condition. Court granted liberty to file fresh representation, directing authorities to decide within three weeks, disposing of the writ petition without adjudicating on merits.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to make representation; authorities directed to decide within three weeks.

Neelam Kumari vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:26738

¶2

Court No. - 20

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1405 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Neelam Kumari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Education Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Kr. Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kumar Ayush,Ran Vijay Singh

¶5

Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.

¶6

The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs :-

¶7

i) Issue writ order or direction in nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No. 1 to 5 that they consider the case of petitioner for posting of petitioner at nearby her residence i.e. in any of the Junior High Schools of Block Kasganj or in Block Soron of District Kasganj within reasonable time as early as possible keeping in view of fact that the son of petitioner is suffering from thalassemia, in the interest of justice.

¶8

ii) Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit just and proper may also kindly be passed."

¶9

Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the respondent-authorities have not properly considered the case of the petitioner, as was presented before. The submission is that the opposite parties may be directed to consider the claim/representation of the petitioner within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this court.

¶10

In view of the innocuous prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case, liberty is granted to the petitioner to make a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 4 within a period of one week from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner, the opposite party no. 4 is directed to decide the same within further period of three weeks, in accordance with law.

¶11

It is clarified that this court has not adjudicated this case on merits.

¶12

With the aforesaid observations, the instant writ

¶13

petition is disposed of .

¶14

Order Date :- 1.4.2024 AKS

¶15

Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Neelam Kumari v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Basic Education Lko. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Neelam Kumari v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Basic Education Lko. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Subedar Vs Ishaq and Others

Sukhram Vs Smt. Janak Dulari and 6 Ors.

Parmanand Shukla Vs Sri Bans Gopal Maurya Principal Secy.Secondary Edu. Govt.

Vijay Kumar Singh Vs Praveen Mani Tripathi and Ors.

Ramesh Chandra Bajpai Vs Alok Dixit Managing Dir. Ex. Officer Member of C/M Board of

Amita Vs Arvind Kumar Prin. Secy. Medical and Health Family and Another