A contempt petition which had become infructuous due to the efflux of time was dismissed as such, with contempt notices discharged.
The contempt petition was dismissed; contempt notices were discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:16862
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1023 of 2015
Applicant :- Amita Opposite Party :- Arvind Kumar Prin. Secy. Medical And Health Family And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Alok Mishra
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Case called out.
None present for the applicant, however, learned Standing Counsel for the State is present.
It seems that by the efflux of time, this contempt petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Contempt notices are hereby discharged.
If the applicant feels that the cause of action still survives, she may move an application for recall of the order within eight weeks.
Consigned to record.
Order Date :- 23.2.2024 Ram Murti
Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Amita
Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
