The High Court dismissed a writ petition questioning an appointment letter, holding that the petitioner lacked locus standi as a member of the Committee of Management.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:135791
Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10550 of 2024
Petitioner :- Bulendra Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of Up And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajnish Kumar Srivastava,Siddharth Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
"(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned appointment letter dated 3.8.2023 issued by Principal of the Institution the respondent no.4 in favour of respondent no.5(Annexure No.1 to this writ petition).
(b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the state authorities to hold an enquiry into the forged appointment of respondent no.5 under Dying in Harness Rule and recover the salary paid to him."
Order Date :- 23.8.2024 Shekhar
Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has locus standi to challenge the appointment of respondent no. 5?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bulendra Kumar Singh
State Of Up And 4 Others
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
