This is a procedural order directing the filing of a counter affidavit and rejoinder in a Public Interest Litigation. It does not decide any substantive issue or dispose of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 293 of 2024
Petitioner :- Ganesh Dutt
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Forest Enviroment Deptt. Lko And 12 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Pandey,Anjani Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ram Raj,Ranjana Srivastava
Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
Heard Sri Rama Pati Shukla, Advocate along with Sri Anil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Akash Sinha, learned Standing Counsel for the State, Ms. Ranjana Srivastava, learned counsel for opposite party nos.2 & 3 and Ms. Kanchan Rawat, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ram Raj, learned counsel for opposite party no.6.
Let the official opposite parties file their counter affidavit within three weeks.
Rejoinder affidavit, if any, be filed within one week.
List immediately thereafter showing the name of Sri Rama Pati Shukla, Advocate along with Sri Anil Kumar Pandey as counsel for the petitioner. The name of Anjani Kumar Srivastava need not be shown in cause list as he does not appear for the petitioner.
After filing the said counter affidavit, we will consider as to whether notices are required to be issued to private opposite parties.
(Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.)
Order Date :- 2.4.2024 Shanu/-
Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ganesh Dutt
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Forest Enviroment Deptt. Lko
Others
Rajan Roy
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
