Bal Krishna Gupta and Others v. Yaar Mohammad
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal listed for removal of office defects; counsel sought time to file supplementary affidavit after correction of the affidavit. Matter directed to be listed the next week as fresh.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- SECOND APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 57 of 2024
Appellant :- Bal Krishna Gupta And Others Respondent :- Yaar Mohammad Counsel for Appellant :- Vivek Kumar Shukla
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
In view of correction of the affidavit on an objection raised by the office Shri Vivek Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the appellant prays for time to file supplementary affidavit to remove the defects.
List in the next week as fresh.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 26.7.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bal Krishna Gupta And Others
- respondent
Yaar Mohammad
Coram
Rajnish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- SAPLD/57/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Ram Narayan Vs Smt. Nanhi and 3 Others
M/s Midmark India (Private) Ltd. through its Ar, Mr. Praveen Kale Vs U.P. Skill Development Mission (Upsdm) through its Mission Director, Lucknow
Rakesh Kumar Dwivedi and Others vs Sanjay Kumar, IAS Managing Director U.P. Cooperative Federation Ltd. Lko.
Mohd. Shafiq vs Smt. Kamlesh and 4 Others