The first appeal filed by the appellants was dismissed for want of prosecution. The court observed that no steps were taken for service of notice on the respondent regarding an earlier order dated 11.06.2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 615 of 2016
Appellant :- Kade Deen And 6 Others Respondent :- Motor Accident Claim Tribunal/A.D.J. Ct.No.3 Raebareli And Ors Counsel for Appellant :- Rishabh Tripathi
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Ms. Shilpi Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel for the appellants submits that learned counsel for the appellants has no instructions in the matter, therefore he is not in a position to assist the court.
Perusal of the order sheet indicates that the steps have not been taken by the appellant for service on the respondent in pursuance of the order dated 11.06.2016.
In view of above, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 26.7.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Kade Deen And 6 Others
Motor Accident Claim Tribunal/A.D.J. Ct.No.3 Raebareli And Ors
Rajnish Kumar
Haseen U.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
