Parasram v. Jairam
Case brief
What is this about?
The second appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant was absent without requesting an adjournment.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:16023
Court No. - 4
Case :- SECOND APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 38 of 2020
Appellant :- Parasram Respondent :- Jairam Counsel for Appellant :- Adnan Ahmad,Varun P. Singh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent :- Girijesh Sharan Srivastava,Dheeraj Srivastava,Girijesh Sharan,Vimal Kishore Verma
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
None is present on behalf of the appellant even in the revised list to press the appeal. There is no request of pass over or adjournment of the case.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This order has been passed in presence of Sri Girijesh Sharan learned counsel for the respondent.
(Rajnish Kumar,J)
Order Date :- 22.2.2024 Harshita
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Parasram
- respondent
Jairam
Coram
Rajnish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- SAPLD/38/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court