The High Court dismissed this appeal for want of prosecution as the appellants were not present in court and failed to seek an adjournment or pass over.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:15351
Court No. - 4
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 236 of 2022
Appellant :- Ram Bhawan And Another Respondent :- Smt. Kalawati Counsel for Appellant :- Amrit Swaroop Gaur Counsel for Respondent :- Amit Tripathi,Sher Bahadur Yadav,Vijai Bahadur Verma
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
None is present on behalf of the appellants even in the revised list to press the appeal. There is no request of pass over or adjournment of the case.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Rajnish Kumar,J.)
Order Date :- 21.2.2024 Harshita
Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ram Bhawan And Another
Smt. Kalawati
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
