The Allahabad High Court dismissed the second appeal under Article 227 dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear or seek adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:15954
Court No. - 4
Case :- SECOND APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 7 of 2017
Appellant :- Jamil Khan And Anr. Respondent :- Farooq Khan And 5 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Ramesh Chandra Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- Upendra Kumar Sagar,Ram Lakhan Vishwakarma
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
None is present on behalf of the appellants even in the revised list to press the appeal. There is no request of pass over or adjournment of the case.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
( Rajnish Kumar,J. )
Order Date :- 22.2.2024 Harshita
Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Jamil Khan And Anr.
Farooq Khan And 5 Others
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
