Second Appeal No. 89 of 1999 was dismissed for want of prosecution. Notice was issued to counsel for the appellant, but none appeared. No request for adjournment was made. The case was closed without hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:50755
Court No. - 6
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 89 of 1999
Appellant :- Smt. Vidya Devi Respondent :- Gayadeen Counsel for Appellant :- Salil K. Srivastava,Anshul Maurya,K.B. Singh,Shivendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- J.S. Misra
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
List is being revised. None is present on behalf of the appellant. There is no request of pass over or adjournment of the case.
The Second Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
. ...................................... .(Rajnish Kumar,J.) Order Date :- 26.7.2024 Banswar
Digitally signed by :- RAM NARESH BANSWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Vidya Devi
Gayadeen
Rajnish Kumar
Ram Nareesh Banswar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
