Lucknow Developmet Authority, Lucknow Thru. Secy., v. Ram Sevak and Others
What the court decided
Court No. - 4
Case :- FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 137 of 2024
Appellant :- Lucknow Developmet Authority, Lucknow Thru. Secy., Respondent :- Ram Sevak And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Rajnish Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Sri Rajnish Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the appellant prays for two months time to deposit the court fee.
In view of above, as prayed two months time is granted to file court fee.
List thereafter as fresh. However, it is made clear that mere filing of this defective appeal will not give any benefit to the appellant in any matter/ proceeding.
........................................ (Rajnish Kumar,J,) Order Date :- 25.10.2024 Banswar
Digitally signed by :- RAM NARESH BANSWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether time should be granted for deposit of court fee in a defective appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Lucknow Development Authority
- respondent
Ram Sevak And Others
Coram
Rajnish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- FAPLD/137/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Prashant Kumar
- Order 2 · Prashant Kumar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Catholic Diocese of Lucknow Thru. Authorized Representative, Father Ronald D Souza vs Mohd. Abdul Salam and Another
Hausila Prasad vs Badarunisa and 10 Others
Asheesh Alias Rinku vs State of U.P. and Another
The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Branch Office, Barabanki Thru. Regional Office Manager vs Smt. Shiksha Singh and Others