Hausila Prasad v. Badarunisa and 10 Others
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 181 of 2024
Appellant :- Hausila Prasad Respondent :- Badarunisa And 10 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Rakesh Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Shri Rakesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the evidence of DW-2, as recorded by the first appellate court, is contrary to the judgment and decree passed by the trial court.
Let the statement of witnesses be filed.
As prayed by learned counsel for the appellant four weeks' time is granted.
List on 25.11.2024.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 24.10.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Hausila Prasad
- respondent
Badarunisa
Coram
Rajnish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- SAPL/181/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Sanjay Singh vs Smt. Bacchi Pandai and Another
Renu Tripathi and Another vs Sri. Subedar Shatrohan Maurya and Others
The National Insurance Company Ltd. Thru. Regional Manager Regional Officer Hazratganj Lko. vs Smt. Sushila Bisht and 4 Others
Lucknow Development Authority, Lucknow Thru. Secretary vs Ramrati