This first appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as no counsel appeared for the appellant to press the matter and no request was made to adjourn. The interim order, if any, was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. - 90 of 2017
Appellant :- Satish Chand Agarwal And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. P.W.D. Civil Sectt. And Ors. Counsel for Appellant :- Ratnesh Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
List is being revised.
None is present on behalf of the appellants to press this appeal nor there is any request to adjourn or pass over the case.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The order has been passed in presence of learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 23.5.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Satish Chand Agarwal And Another
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. P.W.D. Civil Sectt. And Ors.
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
