The second appeal was dismissed as not pressed because the appellant indicated a lack of desire to continue with the appeal during the hearing, with no objection from the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:38927
Court No. - 5
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 81 of 2016
Appellant :- Ram Murti Pandey Respondent :- Sube Chandra And Ors. Counsel for Appellant :- Rajendra Prasad Counsel for Respondent :- Sarvesh Tripathi,Abdul Rasheed,Ganesh Kumar Gupta,Km. Madhurima Bhargava,Pankaj Patel,Raj Kumar Yadav,Zainul Abdin Ansari
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Heard Sri Rajendra Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant, Km. Madhurima Bhargava, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Sri Sarvesh Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5.
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant does not want to press this second appeal and it may be dismissed as such.
There is no objection by the other side.
In view above, the second appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 22.5.2024 Anuj Singh
Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ram Murti Pandey
Sube Chandra And Ors.
Rajnesh Kumar
Anuj Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
