Mohd. Alam Khan v. Ram Sajivan and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Defective first appeal with an application for condonation of delay. Vakalatnama of respondent no.7's counsel was taken on record; the appellant was granted a week to file a supplementary affidavit explaining the delay. Matter listed for December 2024.
What did the court decide?
One week granted to file supplementary affidavit explaining delay; vakalatnama taken on record.
What the court decided
Court No. - 4
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 171 of 2024
Appellant :- Mohd. Alam Khan Respondent :- Ram Sajivan And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Vinod Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Asit Srivastava
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Shri Anchal Mishra, Advocate filed 'Vakalatnama' on behalf of respondent no.7, which is taken on record.
On an objection raised by learned counsel for respondent no.7 that the delay has not properly been explained, learned counsel for the appellant prays for and is granted a week's time to file supplementary affidavit explaining the delay properly.
As prayed list in the week commencing 16th of December 2024 showing the name of Shri Anchal Mishra as counsel for the respondent no.7 in the cause list.
It is made clear that mere filing of this appeal alongwith application for condonation of delay will not give any benefit to the appellant in any manner.
...................................... .(Rajnish Kumar,J.) Order Date :- 3.12.2024 Banswar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mohd. Alam Khan
- respondent
Ram Sajivan
- respondent
Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- FAFOD/171/2024
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court