Disposed

Rizwan v. State of Up and Another

Allahabad HC2 Dec 2024A482/16301/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application under Section 482 CrPC regarding a matrimonial dispute, the Court directed the parties to undergo mediation. The applicant was ordered to deposit Rs. 15,000 to grant interim protection against coercive actions. If the amount is not paid, protection is vacated.

What did the court decide?

Party remitted to Mediation Centre; Applicant directed to deposit Rs. 15,000; No coercive action in pending case until matter concludes.

Rizwan vs State of Up and Another — Matrimonial and Divorce | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Court No. - 75

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16301 of 2024 Applicant :- Rizwan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajit Kumar,Satya Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶5

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the present matter relates to matrimonial dispute between husband and wife and the said matter can be well considered in mediation. It was submitted that there is possibility of reconciliation between the parties and therefore the matter may be referred to the Mediation Centre of this Court.

¶6

Having considered the arguments advanced across the bar, it appears just and proper that in the instant case, the proceedings of mediation/reconciliation be resorted to between the disputing parties.

¶7

It is directed that applicant shall deposit a sum of Rs. 15,000/within two weeks from today with the Mediation Centre of this Court, out of which Rs. 12,000/- shall be released in favour of opposite party no. 2/wife for appearance before the Mediation Centre.

¶8

The matter is remitted to the Mediation Centre for mediation with the direction that same may be dealt with for resolution, after giving notices to both the parties.

¶9

Mediation proceedings shall be concluded expeditiously preferably within a period of eight weeks. The case shall be listed

¶10

before the appropriate Bench after three months.

¶11

Till the next date of listing, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in Complaint Case No.22077 of 2022 (Sadiya Bano Vs. Razwan), under Section 323, 504 I.P.C., Police Station - Dubauliya, District - Basti, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, District Basti.

¶12

After depositing the amount aforesaid, notice shall be issued to the parties and in the case the aforesaid amount is not deposited within the aforesaid period, the interim protection granted above shall automatically be vacated.

¶13

Order Date :- 2.12.2024 RKM

¶14

Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rizwan v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rizwan v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Bhumendra Sharma @ Bhupendra @ Suchhi vs Ramesh Narayan Gupta

Ram Singh and Others vs U.O.I. Ministry of Home Affairs Thru. Joint Secy. Ffr(Enemy Property),C.E.P.I. New Delhi and Others

Neelam Gupta and Others vs Madan Mohan Dalmiya and Others

Praveen Kumar Saxena vs Aryavart Bank (Erstwhile Bhagirath Gramin Bank) Lucknow Thru. Chairman and Another

Mrs. Uma Rawat @ Mrs. Uma Prem Chandra Rawat and 2 Others vs Mrs. Kanhaiya Lal Rawat and 2 Others

Smt. Purnima Singh @ Purnima Vijaybahadur Singh vs Hanumant Singh