First appeal from an order was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear to press the appeal or request an adjournment. Interim orders, if any, were vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 13 of 2024
Appellant :- Sachin Vaishy Respondent :- Srimata And 4 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Suresh Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- Manisha Trivedi
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
List has been revised.
None is present on behalf of the appellants to press this appeal nor there is any request to adjourn or pass over the case.
The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The order has been passed in presence of Shri Amardeep Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Manisha Trivedi, learned counsel for the respondent.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 14.3.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Sachin Vaishy
Srimata
4 Others
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
