Second Appeal No. 191 of 2023 was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant's counsel was absent without request for adjournment.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:4661
Court No. - 4
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 191 of 2023
Appellant :- Ishvar Deen Respondent :- Ram Avtar And Others Counsel for Appellant :- K.K. Singh
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
None is present on behalf of the appellant even in the revised list to press the appeal.
There is no request of pass over or adjournment of the case.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Rajnish Kumar,J.)
Order Date :- 17.1.2024 Harshita
Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ishvar Deen
Ram Avtar
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
