The High Court allowed applications for substitution of parties and condonation of delay. It further dismissed the pending cross objection as not pressed by the objector.
Applications for substitution and condonation of delay allowed; cross objection dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- CROSS OBJECTION No. - 14 of 2015
Objector :- National Insurance Company Ltd.Thru Its Regional Manager Respondent :- Ravindra Bahadur Singh And Ors. 171fafo2015 Counsel for Objector :- Umesh Chandra Chaurasiya Counsel for Respondent :- D.P. Dutt Tiwari,Piyush Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
(I.A. No.03 of 2014) (I.A. No.04 of 2014)
Heard.
These are the applications for substitution on account of death of respondent no.2 and application for condonation of delay in filing the application for substitution.
There is no objection by the other side.
On due consideration, the applications are allowed.
The delay in filing the application for substitution is condoned.
Let the substitution be incorporated during course of the day.
In re: Cross Objection:
Learned counsel for the cross objector submits that the cross objector does not want to press this objection and prays that it may be dismissed as not pressed. To which there is no objection by the other side.
In view of above, this cross objection is dismissed as not pressed.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.)
Order Date :- 7.8.2024
Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ravindra Bahadur Singh And Ors.
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
