The single judge dismissed a civil review application filed with a delay of 893 days due to insufficient grounds for condonation of delay and failure to point out any error apparent on the face of the record.
The application for condonation of delay (I.A. No.01 of 2024) and the review application were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 148 of 2024
Applicant :- Badri And Others Opposite Party :- Jata Shankar And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Fakhruddin Ali Ahmad,Rakesh Kumar,Surendra Singh
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
would be served even by issuing the notice to the respondents to call their objection just for a formality. Thus, the application for condonation of delay (I.A. No.01 of 2024) is dismissed . Consequently, the review application is dismissed .
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 6.8.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether sufficient grounds were shown for condonation of a delay of 893 days in filing a review application.
Whether a time-barred review application where no error apparent on the face of the record is pointed out can be entertained.
Badri And Others
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
