order on application for condonation of delay in preferring a criminal revision noting a delay of 590 days and issuing notices to opposite parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 485 of 2024
Revisionist :- Vidhyadhar Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Deepak Kumar Pandey,Arpit Verma,Tarun Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
(Order on Application for Condonation of Delay)
1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay in preferring the instant criminal revision.
2. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist/ applicant and Ms. Rani Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent.
3. Office report reveals that there is a delay of 590 days in preferring the instant criminal revision.
4. Issue notice to opposite party nos.2 and 3.
5. Objection to the delay condonation application may be filed by the next date of listing.
6. List after expiry of four weeks along with service report.
(Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I, J.)
Order Date :- 22.11.2024 Arnima
Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Vidhyadhar Verma
State Of U.P.
Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko.
2 Others
Ajai Kumar Srivastava
Ist Additional Judge
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
