The court dismissed a criminal revision challenging an order granting interim maintenance to respondents. It held that the revisionist's absence during the hearing was unjustified as he had appeared earlier, rendering psychiatric treatment a pretext.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:55755
Court No. - 11
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 939 of 2024 Revisionist :- Satyendra Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Rama Shanker,Rakesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Order Date :- 13.8.2024 J. K. Dinkar
Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the lower court was justified in granting interim maintenance without hearing the revisionist who was present earlier but failed to appear subsequently.
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko
Smt Sudha
2 Others
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
