Satyendra Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench — Criminal Revision No. 939 of 2024, Satyendra Kumar v. State of U.P. and others: revision against interim maintenance order dated 15.06.2024 of Principal Judge, Family Court, Raebareli (Case No. 669 of 2021, Smt Sudha vs Satyendra Kumar) dismissed; contention of non-hearing rejected as patently misconceived; psychiatric-treatment plea rejected as explanation for absence from 14.03.2024 onwards. Keywords: interim maintenance, Family Court Raebareli, revisionist absent, criminal revision dismissed.
What did the court decide?
The contention that the revisionist was not heard before the impugned order was passed is patently misconceived: the table of proceedings shows that on 14.03.2024 all parties were present and objections were filed, after which the revisionist disappeared without indicating any plausible reason apart from being under psychiatric treatment.