Order listing a criminal revision for fresh arguments. The respondent was granted time to file objections. The case is listed for hearing starting 23.09.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 11
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 859 of 2024
Revisionist :- Aneeta Devi And 2 Others
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., Deptt. Of Home, Lucknow And Another
Counsel for Revisionist :- Rajeiu Kumar Tripathi,Diwakar Singh Gautam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Sri Shailendra Kumar Shukla, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent no. 2.
Sri Shukla prays for and is granted two weeks time to file the objections. Reply, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.
Considering the allegations as have been levelled by the revisionists, list this case in the week commencing 23.09.2024 as fresh showing the name of Sri Shailendra Kumar Shukla, Advocate from the side of respondent.
Order Date :- 5.9.2024 Pachhere/-
Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Aneeta Devi And 2 Others
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy.
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
