Disposed

Ramjan Ali v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Allahabad HC22 Oct 2024CRLR/853/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal revision referred to mediation after parties indicated possibility of settlement; Rs.20,000 of a deposited Rs.25,000 to be given to opposite party no.2 on first appearance, remainder kept with Mediation Centre; interim order continues.

What did the court decide?

Referral to mediation with interim order continuing; Rs.20,000 released to opposite party no.2.

Ramjan Ali vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another — Allahabad HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Court No. - 14

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 853 of 2024

¶3

Revisionist :- Ramjan Ali

¶4

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Ashutosh Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mahendra Pratap Singh

¶5

Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Himanshu Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri M.P. Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.2.

¶7

Pursuant to order dated 22.10.2024 passed by this Court, the amount of Rs.25,000/- has already been deposited by the revisionist and tender of the same is available on record. The revisionist and opposite party no.2 are present before this Court today and have been identified by their counsel.

¶8

Learned counsel for revisionist as well as learned counsel for opposite party no.2 have informed the Court that they have instructions to state that there is a possibility of settlement between the parties in case the matter is refer to the Mediation Centre of this Court.

¶9

This Court is also satisfied on the basis of perusal of the record and the submissions made before it that the nature of litigation is such that there is a possibility to resolve the matter through the process of mediation and an attempt ought to be made to explore that possibility.

¶10

Accordingly, the matter is being referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. The parties shall appear before the Mediation and Conciliation Center on 19.12.2024. Out of the aforesaid amount of Rs.25,000/-, which has already been deposited by the revisionist, Rs20,000/-/- shall be handed over to the opposite party no.2, on her first appearance. It is further provided that Rs.5,000/- will remain deposited with the Mediation Centre.

¶11

The mediator is allowed two months' time to find out possible solution of the dispute between the parties and

¶12

send his report to the court regarding the outcome of mediation on or before the next date.

¶13

List thereafter along with mediation report.

¶14

Interim order, if any, shall continue to operate till the next date of listing.

¶15

It is needless to mention that in case of nonparticipation of the revisionist in the mediation proceedings without any just cause, the interim order shall stand automatically vacated without any further reference of this Court. In that eventuality, learned trial Court shall be at liberty to proceed in this matter in accordance with law.

¶16

(Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I, J.)

¶17

Order Date :- 10.12.2024 A.Dewal

¶18

Digitally signed by :- ASHISH DEWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ramjan Ali v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramjan Ali v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Awdhesh Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Payal Gautam vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko and 4 Others

Noor Alam vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Akhilesh Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others

Abhishek Kumar @ Ravi vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 2 Others

Bauwa @ Brijesh Dhanuk vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.