X- Juvenile v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order in a criminal revision concerning a juvenile; counsel for the State appeared, counsel for opposite party no. 2 was absent, and the matter was listed for a later date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1793 of 2024
Revisionist :- X- Juvenile Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Sanjeev Kumar Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Suyigya Kumar Sharma
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
- List revised.
- Sri Sanjeev Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State are present. Sri Suyigya Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 is not present even when the matter is taken in the revised list.
- There is a request of Bar Association not to pass any adverse order from 18.09.2024 to 20.09.2024 due to flood in many areas of the city which has been circulated under the orders dated 17.09.2024 of Hon'ble The Chief Justice to the Courts.
- In view of the same, in the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned for today.
- Let the matter be listed on 21.10.2024.
Order Date :- 20.9.2024 AS Rathore
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
X- Juvenile
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Opposite Party No. 2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/1793/2024
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court