Hira Lal v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal revision matter listed for hearing. Counsel for the State reported lack of instructions. Counsel for the revisionist sought an adjournment for one month.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1124 of 2024
Revisionist :- Hira Lal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Shashi Bhushan Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
- Sri Priyanshu Dwivedi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Shashi Bhushan Rai, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Birendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the State are present.
- Learned counsel for the State submits that his file is with him in which he has not received instructions in the matter.
- Learned counsel for the revisionist prays for an adjournment for a month in the matter.
- Prayer is allowed.
- Let the matter be listed on 13.11.2024.
- It is made clear that there is no interim order passed by this Court.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Hira Lal
- respondent
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Coram
Samit Gopal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/1124/2024
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court