Jitendra Dwivedi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 27
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 175 of 2024
Revisionist :- Jitendra Dwivedi
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another
Counsel for Revisionist :- Dilip Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
- Heard Sri Dilip Kumar Pandey, the learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Rakesh Kumar Singh, the learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Ram Milan Yadav, the learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2.
- By means of the instant revision filed under Section 19 (4) of Family Court Act, the revisionist has challenged the validity of the impugned order dated 06.01.2024, passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Sultanpur in Criminal Misc. Case No.599 of 2021, filed under Section 125 Cr.P.C. whereby the Family Court has ordered the revisionist to pay Rs.4,000/per month as maintenance to his wife-the opposite party no.2 and it has been provided that the amount ordered to be paid as maintenance in any other proceeding will be adjusted in the payment of this amount. A sum of Rs.3,000/- per month has already been awarded to the opposite party no.2 as maintenance in the proceedings under Section 12 of Protection of Women under Domestic Violence Act.
Coram
Subhash Vidyarthi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/175/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
- Order 2 · Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court