Disposed

Krishan Kumar Gupta v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC24 Sept 2024CRLR/1181/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Revision No. 1181/2024, the court referred the matter to the Mediation Centre after the revisionist deposited Rs. 25,000 and parties agreed to explore mediation for the matrimonial dispute. Directions for future listing were issued.

What did the court decide?

Matter referred to Mediation Centre; Rs. 20,000 released to respondent; parties to appear on 12.11.2024; mediator given two months.

Krishan Kumar Gupta vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another — Allahabad HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Court No. - 14

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1181 of 2024

¶3

Revisionist :- Krishan Kumar Gupta Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Girdhari Lal Shukla,Seeta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.

¶5

1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A appearing for the State, Sri Suraj Singh Visen, Advocate, who has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party No.2 by filing his vakalatnama in Court today, which is taken on record.

¶6

2. Vide order dated 24.09.2024, this Court has passed the following order :-

¶7

" Order on memo of revision

¶8

Heard.

¶9

Learned counsel for the revisionist states that there is every likelihood of the parties entering into a settlement in case the matter is referred to the Mediation Center of this Court.

¶10

Considering the aforesaid, issue notice to respondent No. 2.

¶11

List on 22.10.2024 as fresh on which date the respondent No.2 shall remain before this Court either personally or through her counsel to indicate as to whether she is willing to go for mediation.

¶12

It is further provided that in case an amount of Rs.25,000/- is deposited within two weeks from today before this court, no coercive action shall be taken against the revisionist.

¶13

It is needless to mention that in case the revisionist fail to deposit the amount of Rs. 25,000/- within a period of two weeks, benefit of this order shall not be available to him."

¶14

3. In deference to the aforesaid order of this Court dated 24.09.2024, an amount of Rs.25,000/- has been deposited by the revisionist vide D.D. No.081167. A copy of receipt thereof is annexed to the instant revision. Learned counsel for the revisionist and learned counsel for opposite party No.2 have submitted that both the parties have agreed that the dispute between them being matrimonial in nature may be resolved through the process of mediation.

¶15

4. This Court is also satisfied on the basis of perusal of the record and the submissions made before it that the nature of litigation is such that there is a chance to resolve the matter through the process of mediation and an attempt ought to be made to explore that possibility.

¶16

5. Accordingly, the matter is being referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. Out of the deposited amount, Rs.20,000/- shall be handed over to the opposite party No.2, Smt. Komal Gupta, on her first appearance for miscellaneous expenses. It is further provided that a sum of Rs.5,000/- shall remain deposited with the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. The parties shall appear before the Mediation Centre of this Court on 12.11.2024.

¶17

6. The mediator is allowed two months' time to find out possible solution of the dispute between the parties and send his report to this Court regarding the outcome of mediation.

¶18

7. List this case immediately thereafter alongwith the report of the mediator .

¶19

8. Interim order, if any, shall continue to operate till the next date of listing.

¶20

9. It is made clear that in case of default or non-participation of the revisionist in the mediation proceedings, the interim order shall automatically come to an end without any further reference to this Court.

¶21

10. When the case is listed next, the name of Sri Suraj Singh Visen, Advocate, shall be shown in the cause list as learned counsel for opposite party No.2.

¶22

(Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I, J.)

¶23

Order Date :- 22.10.2024 cks/-

¶24

Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Krishan Kumar Gupta v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishan Kumar Gupta v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Manglesh Kumar @ Ranjeet Goswami Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Vashi Ahmad Vs State of U.P. Thru.Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and Another

Shivam Verma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Seema Yadav and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko. and Others

Dr. Vishwa Prakash Arya and Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Urmila Devi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another