The criminal revision was dismissed in default. The revisionist failed to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- despite earlier direction and did not appear to plead the case or seek adjournment.
The revision was dismissed in default; any interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:66988
Court No. - 11
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1024 of 2024
Revisionist :- Sachin Verma Opposite Party :- Additional Principal Judge (Family Court) Court No. 2 Sitapur And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Himanshu Shukla
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Vakalatnama filed by Shri Subodh Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party No.2 is taken on record.
List revised.
Nobody has put in appearance on behalf of the revisionist.
Despite this Court, vide order dated 02.09.2024, on the intention of learned counsel for the revisionist to settle the matter in case the matter is referred to the mediation centre of this Court, had required the revisionist to deposit an amount of Rs.25,000/-, as per the office report dated 25.09.2024 the amount has still not been deposited.
Considering the aforesaid and that no request for adjournment has been made on behalf of the revisionist, the revision is dismissed in default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 26.9.2024 S. Shivhare
Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Abdul Moin
Shashank Shivhare
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
